<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wait till I come!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wait-till-i.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com</link>
	<description>Chris Heilmann - Accessibility, Web Development and Pragmatism - can talk, will travel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:39:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on GeoMaker &#8211; easily turning web content into copy and paste maps and Geo microformats by keldwud</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2009/07/01/geomaker/comment-page-1/#comment-11290</link>
		<dc:creator>keldwud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/?p=907#comment-11290</guid>
		<description>Attempting to parse content from websites that include addresses does not generate location flags associated with that address. The only location that gets flagged is the city and that is all.

The content that I was using to test the service was from nextstop.com.

Loving the concept, though. I also agree with David that having the placemarks link to content would be an amazing idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attempting to parse content from websites that include addresses does not generate location flags associated with that address. The only location that gets flagged is the city and that is all.</p>
<p>The content that I was using to test the service was from nextstop.com.</p>
<p>Loving the concept, though. I also agree with David that having the placemarks link to content would be an amazing idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Event Handling versus  Event Delegation by Yaroukh</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2006/09/24/event-handling-versus-event-delegation/comment-page-1/#comment-11289</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaroukh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11289</guid>
		<description>OMG

Steve Bush: +1

People, you don&#039;t delegate anything! There is no &quot;event handling&quot; vs. &quot;event delegating&quot;. When you speak about &quot;delegating events&quot; you still _handle_ events.
Events do _bubble_ (many years now) i.e. browser _propagates_ them through DOM - in which process you can &quot;catch&quot; and _handle_ them. And all of this is happenning regardles of where you attach your event-handlers to, ragerdless of where you _handle_ those events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">OMG</span></p>
<p>Steve Bush: +1</p>
<p>People, you don&#8217;t delegate anything! There is no &#8220;event handling&#8221; vs. &#8220;event delegating&#8221;. When you speak about &#8220;delegating events&#8221; you still <em>handle</em> events.<br />
Events do <em>bubble</em> (many years now) i.e. browser <em>propagates</em> them through <span class="caps">DOM </span>- in which process you can &#8220;catch&#8221; and <em>handle</em> them. And all of this is happenning regardles of where you attach your event-handlers to, ragerdless of where you <em>handle</em> those events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GeoMaker &#8211; easily turning web content into copy and paste maps and Geo microformats by David Berkowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2009/07/01/geomaker/comment-page-1/#comment-11288</link>
		<dc:creator>David Berkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/?p=907#comment-11288</guid>
		<description>One thing I&#039;d love to see here is having the placemarks link to the actual content. This is very cool and I&#039;d love to see where it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I&#8217;d love to see here is having the placemarks link to the actual content. This is very cool and I&#8217;d love to see where it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On password fields masking and Jakob Nielsen by Matthew Kempster</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2009/06/26/on-password-fields-masking-and-jakob-nielsen/comment-page-1/#comment-11287</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Kempster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/?p=901#comment-11287</guid>
		<description>Christian,

What Jakob didn&#039;t mention or consider is that there are lots of place where you absolutely are surrounded.

Such as at school. When I was at school (just last year) it seemed to be a common thing for kids to try and look at others&#039; passwords. Even if it&#039;s just as a joke in a kind of &quot;Haha I know your password&quot; type way!

So the idea of unmasking passwords on computers is ridiculous. I would choose not to use a website if the password was not hidden.

The script (or general idea of having a hide/unhide option) is great, until you are hit with the exact scenario above where most schools/offices use IE6 as opposed to Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian,</p>
<p>What Jakob didn&#8217;t mention or consider is that there are lots of place where you absolutely are surrounded.</p>
<p>Such as at school. When I was at school (just last year) it seemed to be a common thing for kids to try and look at others&#8217; passwords. Even if it&#8217;s just as a joke in a kind of &#8220;Haha I know your password&#8221; type way!</p>
<p>So the idea of unmasking passwords on computers is ridiculous. I would choose not to use a website if the password was not hidden.</p>
<p>The script (or general idea of having a hide/unhide option) is great, until you are hit with the exact scenario above where most schools/offices use <span class="caps">IE6 </span>as opposed to Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The future is hybrids &#8211; how JavaScript can purify pure CSS solutions by New design trend: Logos that change to show you they&#8217;re a &#8216;home&#8217; link &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2006/09/04/the-future-is-hybrids-how-javascript-can-purify-pure-css-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-11285</link>
		<dc:creator>New design trend: Logos that change to show you they&#8217;re a &#8216;home&#8217; link &#187; malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11285</guid>
		<description>[...] the following may help too (although CSS solutions are probably better than javascript ones - see CSS vs javascript) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the following may help too (although <span class="caps">CSS </span>solutions are probably better than javascript ones &#8211; see <span class="caps">CSS </span>vs javascript) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
