<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Code tutorials for lazy people with Ajax Code Display</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/</link>
	<description>Chris Heilmann - Accessibility, Web Development and Pragmatism - can talk, will travel</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff L</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6954</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6954</guid>
		<description>Awesome stuff...I can definitely see using this.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome stuff&#8230;I can definitely see using this.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6951</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6951</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I disagree with faster development though. Once you wrote in jQuery for a long time it might be the case, but personally I am confused with all the chaining and anonymous functions. I try to know my scope in my scripts and actually hate “this” as it is never unambiguous.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree that chaining can be difficult to get used to, but it allows you to do so much more to be in a single line of code.  You end up with expressive code that doesn't rely on calling the object over and over again throughout the script to apply it's properties/functions.  If used wisely, each line of code defines an object's actions and properties, without "scatterbraining" them throughout the script.  That is only one, purely organizational benefit that I recognize every time I write a script.  And the more I use jQuery, the more I realize that it has every bit of functionality that I need to get the job done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I disagree with faster development though. Once you wrote in jQuery for a long time it might be the case, but personally I am confused with all the chaining and anonymous functions. I try to know my scope in my scripts and actually hate &acirc;this&acirc; as it is never unambiguous.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree that chaining can be difficult to get used to, but it allows you to do so much more to be in a single line of code.  You end up with expressive code that doesn&#8217;t rely on calling the object over and over again throughout the script to apply it&#8217;s properties/functions.  If used wisely, each line of code defines an object&#8217;s actions and properties, without &#8220;scatterbraining&#8221; them throughout the script.  That is only one, purely organizational benefit that I recognize every time I write a script.  And the more I use jQuery, the more I realize that it has every bit of functionality that I need to get the job done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hosting Bookmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6950</link>
		<dc:creator>Hosting Bookmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6950</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I hope those tutorial will be helpful and user friendly. One ready you can submit them to a special section I'd provide and they will reach targeted audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I hope those tutorial will be helpful and user friendly. One ready you can submit them to a special section I&#8217;d provide and they will reach targeted audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6947</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6947</guid>
		<description>Thanks for replying. It is interesting in that a major bit of work we are doing now, I am actually using both jQuery and YUI -- I have to admit I first found jQuery weird, but I really like it now.

YUI is more like what I would normally expect to be writing so that was quick to get going with.

The amount of time and code I have saved with jQuery though has really impressed me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for replying. It is interesting in that a major bit of work we are doing now, I am actually using both jQuery and <span class="caps">YUI </span>&#8211; I have to admit I first found jQuery weird, but I really like it now.</p>
<p><span class="caps">YUI </span>is more like what I would normally expect to be writing so that was quick to get going with.</p>
<p>The amount of time and code I have saved with jQuery though has really impressed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6945</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/28/code-tutorials-for-lazy-people-with-ajax-code-display/#comment-6945</guid>
		<description>The reason was actually circumstances: I wrote this on my eeePC in Kate on Linux and I hadn't gotten the localhost to run yet. As jQuery's ajax works nicely with file:// and http:// I chose that. 

I also said in my talk at @mediaAjax that it doesn't matter what library you use unless you use one :) 

I disagree with faster development though. Once you wrote in jQuery for a long time it might be the case, but personally I am confused with all the chaining and anonymous functions. I try to know my scope in my scripts and actually hate "this" as it is never unambiguous. 

jQuery is a great piece of work, but I personally think it needs a lot of effort to write maintainable and clean code with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason was actually circumstances: I wrote this on my eeePC in Kate on Linux and I hadn&#8217;t gotten the localhost to run yet. As jQuery&#8217;s ajax works nicely with file:// and <a href="http://" rel="nofollow">http://</a> I chose that. </p>
<p>I also said in my talk at @mediaAjax that it doesn&#8217;t matter what library you use unless you use one :) </p>
<p>I disagree with faster development though. Once you wrote in jQuery for a long time it might be the case, but personally I am confused with all the chaining and anonymous functions. I try to know my scope in my scripts and actually hate &#8220;this&#8221; as it is never unambiguous. </p>
<p>jQuery is a great piece of work, but I personally think it needs a lot of effort to write maintainable and clean code with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
