<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A quick idea: JavaScript version controlling for static HTML documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/</link>
	<description>Chris Heilmann - Accessibility, Web Development and Pragmatism - can talk, will travel</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gillesB</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6919</link>
		<dc:creator>gillesB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6919</guid>
		<description>An improvement could be to provide a way to update your copy if it is updated, like a 'synchronize' button.

Maybe Harmony could be used (http://alliance.seas.upenn.edu/~harmony/cgi-bin/demo.php) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An improvement could be to provide a way to update your copy if it is updated, like a &#8217;synchronize&#8217; button.</p>
<p>Maybe Harmony could be used (http://alliance.seas.upenn.edu/~harmony/cgi-bin/demo.php) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sil</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6894</link>
		<dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6894</guid>
		<description>Chris: I see the theory; it's just not something that can be relied upon. Nice idea, though.

And...we've had automatic updates since, ooh, forever, dude. Your proprietary vendor-lockin operating systems are just starting to catch up to where Debian was ten years ago :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: I see the theory; it&#8217;s just not something that can be relied upon. Nice idea, though.</p>
<p>And&#8230;we&#8217;ve had automatic updates since, ooh, forever, dude. Your proprietary vendor-lockin operating systems are just starting to catch up to where Debian was ten years ago :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6893</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6893</guid>
		<description>@sil, not really and yes maybe. Call it an alert. If you use the documents offline you won't get a difference, if you open them from your HD and go online you'll get an alert to get the new ones. Much like any virus software or Mac/Windows update works, too. With you mainly using communist operating systems you wouldn't know of course :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sil, not really and yes maybe. Call it an alert. If you use the documents offline you won&#8217;t get a difference, if you open them from your HD and go online you&#8217;ll get an alert to get the new ones. Much like any virus software or Mac/Windows update works, too. With you mainly using communist operating systems you wouldn&#8217;t know of course :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Langridge</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6892</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Langridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6892</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I'm wrong here, but this isn't that helpful: it only works at the points when you don't need it because you're connected to the net anyway. If you've got a net connection then use the online documents; if you don't have an online connection then it won't work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong here, but this isn&#8217;t that helpful: it only works at the points when you don&#8217;t need it because you&#8217;re connected to the net anyway. If you&#8217;ve got a net connection then use the online documents; if you don&#8217;t have an online connection then it won&#8217;t work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobMcM</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6891</link>
		<dc:creator>RobMcM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wait-till-i.com/2008/01/14/a-quick-idea-javascript-version-controlling-for-static-html-documents/#comment-6891</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea, yet so simple.

The only problem is, people may be looking at this offline...

You could have an option to load in the new version via the DOM if it's available. The problem then is when they are next off line they would get the old version again. However once you detect there is a new version, you could set a cookie to alert them it's out of date when they are next off line.

Or you could tell them to download a new version if it's out of date, but then you have problems with people organizing things etc... The DOM update solution would solve that but then lack for offline compatibility. 

Perhaps Google Gears would be the total solution :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea, yet so simple.</p>
<p>The only problem is, people may be looking at this offline&#8230;</p>
<p>You could have an option to load in the new version via the <span class="caps">DOM </span>if it&#8217;s available. The problem then is when they are next off line they would get the old version again. However once you detect there is a new version, you could set a cookie to alert them it&#8217;s out of date when they are next off line.</p>
<p>Or you could tell them to download a new version if it&#8217;s out of date, but then you have problems with people organizing things etc&#8230; The <span class="caps">DOM </span>update solution would solve that but then lack for offline compatibility. </p>
<p>Perhaps Google Gears would be the total solution :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
