<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moved to media temple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wait-till-i.com/2006/11/07/moved-to-mediatemple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2006/11/07/moved-to-mediatemple/</link>
	<description>For a better web with more professional jobs - can talk, will travel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.wait-till-i.com/2006/11/07/moved-to-mediatemple/comment-page-1/#comment-3384</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3384</guid>
		<description>I have been looking around for a new host, one that better supports backend CMS, and media temple has caught my eye. Is it really that much better than the standard run-of-the-mill host, for around half the price?

The grid server looks very cool, and from what I can tell it might make downtime a thing of the past, or a very very rare occurrence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been looking around for a new host, one that better supports backend <span class="caps">CMS</span>, and media temple has caught my eye. Is it really that much better than the standard run-of-the-mill host, for around half the price?</p>
<p>The grid server looks very cool, and from what I can tell it might make downtime a thing of the past, or a very very rare occurrence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
